On the one hand, YouTube  allows both political campaigns and advocacy groups to inexpensively and quickly  get their messages out to a potentially wide  audience.
In other words, TV is no  longer the only game in town as a communication medium for  videos.
Now you can upload a  political ad to a website and hope it generates enough buzz to go  “viral.”
Unfortunately, however, the  eagerness to create such viral campaigns has also helped to undermine the  overall effectiveness of some political messaging.
What do I  mean?
Well, instead of crafting ads  to sway public opinion, political consultants and ad people are now producing  spots that seemed designed solely to generate website  “clicks”.
In short, getting a political  point across is increasingly taking a backseat to creating spots which are  sometimes funny, sometimes outlandish, or sometimes  bizarre.
I saw this phenomenon  first-hand last year while working in  New Hampshire 
 One of our opponents, a  businessman named Jim Bender, came up with video spot called “Yum  Yum.”
It featured an actor in an  Uncle Sam costume greedily devouring cakes shaped like banks, cars and college  diplomas. The more he ate, the more bloated Uncle Sam  got.
The spot was certainly  amusing and it generated a lot of good media coverage. One journalist gave it an  “A” for creativity; a political newspaper called it a “must see” ad and it was  featured on MSNBC.
So the Yum Yum ad generated  media buzz and went viral, all the things you want a YouTube video to  do.
But despite all that good  stuff, the ad didn’t work where it really mattered; it didn’t help Bender win  support.
Before the ads starting  running he was mired in last place in the polls and that’s where he stayed right  up to Election Day.
Yes his ad was entertaining,  but it didn’t really give people a reason to think Bender would be an  effective   US 
Hence it was a creative  success, but a political failure.
Meanwhile, here in  Canada 
The NCC spot featured photos of the then three opposition leaders – Michael Ignatieff, Gilles Duceppe and Jack Layton -- superimposed on the bodies of the Three Stooges.
As the “Stooges” in the ad  hit, bashed and poked each other, viewers were warned against “socialist”  plans.
“Don’t be a stooge,” says the  ad at the end “vote against socialism.”
Since the New Democrats  enjoyed their most successful election in history, it seems the NCC’s video  appeal to stop socialism wasn’t all that effective.
And that’s not surprising.  The creators of the ad were so focused on creating a funny, imaginative ad, it  seems they neglected to put any thought into their actual political  message.
How does Moe bonking Curly on  the head with a wrench cause Canadians to fear  socialism?
Yet for the NCC that probably  didn’t matter. All that mattered was amassing a large number of YouTube hits so  they could brag about it to their members.
Now don’t get me  wrong.
It’s perfectly fine to make  political ads entertaining and humorous.
However, the humor must  complement the overall strategic message you are trying to get  across.
At the end of the day, after  all, the goal isn’t just to make people laugh, it’s to win votes for your  candidate or to win converts to your cause.
 
 

No comments:
Post a Comment