The reason I'd be hesitant to dismantle the CWB were farmers to change their minds and vote against CWB, is that Canada enjoys a 20% or so premium in our wheat price in world markets. I'd expect the premium to erode with private marketing. Also, farming is by nature counter-cyclical. Those farmers that suck at marketing but thought they were good, will lose their farms and raise their families on a Labor Ready wage. Not good for anyone. But maybe I'm wrong and the premium would outlast CWB? The troubling aspect is I haven't even seen the premium issue mentioned by CWB opponents (like S.Harper).
Hey phillip, anytime you want to reference how farmers get a 20% price premium with verified sources, feel free.
20% price discount is more often the case!
You don't really sound like a farmer, so I will ask why do you suppose it is that farmers in Ontario and Quebec are not lobbying to go under the full control of the CWB with those 20% premium prices?
... Phillip... who are you to deny the freedom of another Canadian citizen to market his goods as he chooses? ... As always, we are looking at another policy of economic collectivism- the denial of the values of individual liberty and private property.
Nope, I don't have any references as to how much, if any, of the 20% premium is from single marketed brand. My point is the issue wasn't even discussed. And no, not a farmer. I've noticed in many industries administrative overhead is deadweight and a distraction. I'm pointing out that if wheat farmers decide to lose some farming expertise to gain entrepreneurial skills, if they suck at marketing there won't be as many safety nets.
How much do you guys think single marketing is responsible for the 20% Canada brand premium? I'd guess not much until publicized quality-control issues, whether real or not, make the news in protectionist export markets. Price discount occurs in rising grain price environment and premium occurs in lowering price environment; CWB price to farmers is a trailing indicator. If CWB is fractured, I'm for removing some existing taxpayer-funded public safety nets, as I'm sure you free-market guys are too.
Sorry, last comment is mine. I suppose barley is a good case study. It dual marketing works throughout an entire business cycle it would be tough not to change my mind.
Gerry Nicholls is a communications consultant and writer who has been called a “political warrior” a “brilliant strategist” and one of the “canniest political observers in Canada.”
He has worked as a consultant in both the United States and Canada and was formerly a senior officer in the National Citizens Coalition.
A regular columnist with the Ottawa Hill Times, his work has also appeared in the Globe and Mail, the National Post and in the Sun Media chain; and he has appeared on countless TV and radio public affairs programs. He is the author of the book, Loyal to the Core, Harper, Me and the NCC.
“Loyal to the Core is a daring and provocative work. It deserves to be read by conservative activists and politicos.” – Western Standard
“This is a very important book.” -- Michael Coren, TV host
“A fascinating read” --- Seamus O'Regan, Canada AM
“I really enjoyed Loyal to the Core. It’s a great book”, - Charles Adler, radio host.
"Loyal to the Core should be required reading for anyone considering or starting a career at a conservative think tank or in electoral politics in general …Consider Loyal to the Core a cautionary tale that’s also a funny, easy read – with a few highly “stealable” ideas for media campaigns thrown in for good measure.”- Kathy Shaidle, author Tyranny of Nice
“Every Canadian remotely interested in politics and the state of the country should have a read of Loyal to the Core. – blogger Wendy Sullivan
"It’s rare to find a politico, however, who is equally passionate about policy and strategy, but columnist, pundit, author and Western Standard blogger Gerry Nicholls is such a person." Matthew Johnson, owner Western Standard
"If you are a conservative who wonders how conservatives can communicate their message in a hostile media climate, Loyal to the Core is a must read." -- At Home in Hespeler
"You HAVE TO read this book!" -- Connie Fournier Free Dominion
6 comments:
The reason I'd be hesitant to dismantle the CWB were farmers to change their minds and vote against CWB, is that Canada enjoys a 20% or so premium in our wheat price in world markets. I'd expect the premium to erode with private marketing. Also, farming is by nature counter-cyclical. Those farmers that suck at marketing but thought they were good, will lose their farms and raise their families on a Labor Ready wage. Not good for anyone.
But maybe I'm wrong and the premium would outlast CWB? The troubling aspect is I haven't even seen the premium issue mentioned by CWB opponents (like S.Harper).
... No man stands so small as one who would deny his neighbor the freedom to sell the fruit of his labours as he chooses.
Hey phillip, anytime you want to reference how farmers get a 20% price premium with verified sources, feel free.
20% price discount is more often the case!
You don't really sound like a farmer, so I will ask why do you suppose it is that farmers in Ontario and Quebec are not lobbying to go under the full control of the CWB with those 20% premium prices?
... Phillip... who are you to deny the freedom of another Canadian citizen to market his goods as he chooses?
... As always, we are looking at another policy of economic collectivism- the denial of the values of individual liberty and private property.
Nope, I don't have any references as to how much, if any, of the 20% premium is from single marketed brand. My point is the issue wasn't even discussed. And no, not a farmer.
I've noticed in many industries administrative overhead is deadweight and a distraction. I'm pointing out that if wheat farmers decide to lose some farming expertise to gain entrepreneurial skills, if they suck at marketing there won't be as many safety nets.
How much do you guys think single marketing is responsible for the 20% Canada brand premium? I'd guess not much until publicized quality-control issues, whether real or not, make the news in protectionist export markets.
Price discount occurs in rising grain price environment and premium occurs in lowering price environment; CWB price to farmers is a trailing indicator.
If CWB is fractured, I'm for removing some existing taxpayer-funded public safety nets, as I'm sure you free-market guys are too.
Sorry, last comment is mine. I suppose barley is a good case study. It dual marketing works throughout an entire business cycle it would be tough not to change my mind.
Post a Comment