It saddened me to learn of the recent passing of a great
Canadian named Merv Lavigne
I knew Merv way back in the 1980s when he was a community
college teacher from Haileybury, a small town in northern Ontario .
And what made Merv a great Canadian, at least to my mind,
was his courage and his willingness to fight for what he believed in.
In fact, that’s how Merv and I ended up crossing paths; in
1985 he joined forces with a group I once worked for, the National Citizens
Coalition, to fight a legal battle aimed at changing Canada ’s labour laws so that union
bosses would no longer have the power to use forced dues to subsidize their
political propaganda.
Merv, a Liberal activist who had run for federal office,
didn’t like the fact that a portion of his dues was being used to subsidize
the New Democratic Party and other causes.
So, with the NCC’s moral and financial support, Merv
launched what would prove to be an historic court challenge.
Merv’s argument was simple: Forcing him to associate with a
political party, through his compelled union dues, violated his freedom of
association which was guaranteed in the then newly minted Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.
And although Merv was just one guy, his challenge scared the
bejeezus out of Canada ’s
entire union movement.
Indeed, just about every big union organization in the
country intervened in this case to oppose him.
Alas, it was a David vs Goaliath battle where Goliath ended
up winning.
In 1991 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled against Merv,
which is why, by the way, unions today are free to spend millions of dollars in
forced union dues on political propaganda campaigns, whether their unionized employees like
it or not.
And a lot of them don’t like it.
At any rate, I’ll always remember Merv as a guy who cheerfully
and tirelessly endured six years of arduous legal combat.
It was a lot of work for a guy who already had a full time
job: He attended fundraising events across the country, spoke to countless
organizations, did hundreds of media interviews.
He also, sadly, endured harassment.
But never once did I ever hear him utter a single word of
complaint.
One positive by-product of Merv’s hard work, was it significantly
raised his profile and made him something of a media star.
The NCC’s own internal polling showed he had
incredible favourables. People liked him; they liked his message. And why not? He had proven to be an intelligent and articulate spokesman.
Had he wished to re-enter the political arena, Merv could
have easily got himself elected to Parliament and we told him so.
But, having enough of the limelight, he decided to focus on
his family and his career.
Mind you, Merv had already accomplished a lot.
He put a key question of individual freedom on the national
agenda; he rattled the establishment’s cage, and he fought a good fight for his
principles.
That’s a pretty good epitaph.
1 comment:
sounded like a good man. Condolences to his family.
Post a Comment