Given all the publicity the anti-Globalization rioters get these days, it might surprise you to learn that in early nineteenth century
Yes it’s true.
That’s just one interesting little historical tidbit I discovered while reading A Splendid Exchange: How Trade Shaped the World, by William J. Bernstein.
The book looks at the history of international trade, from the times when cavemen exchanged seashells for antlers to today’s debates over globalization.
And at the risk of sounding like some sort of ubergeek, let me confess I am finding it to be fascinating reading.
Especially interesting is learning how governments through the ages sought to squelch international commerce, usually at the behest of some special interest group.
For instance, in seventeenth century
In response, Bernstein writes Parliament considered a number of bills, “One would have required the wearing of wool by all students, faculty members, judges and lawyers; another, the wearing of wool by all citizens six months of the year; yet another, the wearing of felt hats by all female servants earning less than five pounds per year.”
Sounds like the kind of ideas Ontario's Premier Dalton McGuinty would consider.
Fortunately, these measures were shot down. (Hurting the chances of these bills passing were East India Company bribes which ended up in the pockets of key members of the House of Lords.)
One bill, however, did pass in 1678 requiring the dead be buried in wool!
The next British protectionist surge was a lot less comical.
In 1815, at the behest of the landed aristocracy, Parliament created a series of “Corn Laws” designed to keep foreign grain out of
As Bernstein notes, “Protectionist legislation usually strikes at the weak and powerless and the Corn Law of 1815 was no exception.”
Indeed, the price of bread skyrocketed meaning the poor could not afford to eat. Hence the riots demanding free trade.
Eventually, powered by the pro-free trade ideas of Adam Smith and others, a new group of leaders emerged in
Free trade won.
But, of course, the fight for freedom never really ends.
There will always be protectionist politicians, business leaders, big union bosses and academics who will put their own parochial interests ahead of the interests of consumers.
Too bad we can’t bury their ideas in wool.