Conservatives want to go back in time to progress a lower state of mind and make the people go blind! And they think their the best, but their just a mess just a product of a system no greater no less.
... Simple... end the principle of economic collectivism- the role of the state forcing money from one citizen to another- and all these policies fade away.
Not to mention that SOME provinces (Ontario) can break agreements with Ottawa, especially when it comes to Heritage Canada money that is supposed to pay for French language instruction!
I would get rid of equalization not because I oppose the principle of it, but rather than helping provinces when they are struggling it seems to just be a political football used by each premier. Instead of bringing Canadians together, it simply tears them apart. Transfer payments can always be adjusted to make up for changes in equalization. At the very least, I would support keeping it if an independent board was appointed and they would decide on it. This would take the politics out of it, which is what is really messing it up.
... Miles... always a thoughtful, well-expressed comment. ... Unfortunately, once a nation begins down the slippery slope of economic collectivism- the philosophy that everyone's income and property is to be considered common property (communism) to be re-distributed by the state- there is no possible objective line to limit this intervention.
Gerry Nicholls is a communications consultant and writer who has been called a “political warrior” a “brilliant strategist” and one of the “canniest political observers in Canada.”
He has worked as a consultant in both the United States and Canada and was formerly a senior officer in the National Citizens Coalition.
A regular columnist with the Ottawa Hill Times, his work has also appeared in the Globe and Mail, the National Post and in the Sun Media chain; and he has appeared on countless TV and radio public affairs programs. He is the author of the book, Loyal to the Core, Harper, Me and the NCC.
“Loyal to the Core is a daring and provocative work. It deserves to be read by conservative activists and politicos.” – Western Standard
“This is a very important book.” -- Michael Coren, TV host
“A fascinating read” --- Seamus O'Regan, Canada AM
“I really enjoyed Loyal to the Core. It’s a great book”, - Charles Adler, radio host.
"Loyal to the Core should be required reading for anyone considering or starting a career at a conservative think tank or in electoral politics in general …Consider Loyal to the Core a cautionary tale that’s also a funny, easy read – with a few highly “stealable” ideas for media campaigns thrown in for good measure.”- Kathy Shaidle, author Tyranny of Nice
“Every Canadian remotely interested in politics and the state of the country should have a read of Loyal to the Core. – blogger Wendy Sullivan
"It’s rare to find a politico, however, who is equally passionate about policy and strategy, but columnist, pundit, author and Western Standard blogger Gerry Nicholls is such a person." Matthew Johnson, owner Western Standard
"If you are a conservative who wonders how conservatives can communicate their message in a hostile media climate, Loyal to the Core is a must read." -- At Home in Hespeler
"You HAVE TO read this book!" -- Connie Fournier Free Dominion
6 comments:
Conservatives want to go back in time to progress a lower state of mind and make the people go blind! And they think their the best, but their just a mess just a product of a system no greater no less.
... Simple... end the principle of economic collectivism- the role of the state forcing money from one citizen to another- and all these policies fade away.
Not to mention that SOME provinces (Ontario) can break agreements with Ottawa, especially when it comes to Heritage Canada money that is supposed to pay for French language instruction!
Zolton - please use the word "they're" correctly. It is short for "they are". "Their" is all about someone's possession.
Maybe all of us their bloggers could quit texting and go back to proper-ly english.
I would get rid of equalization not because I oppose the principle of it, but rather than helping provinces when they are struggling it seems to just be a political football used by each premier. Instead of bringing Canadians together, it simply tears them apart. Transfer payments can always be adjusted to make up for changes in equalization. At the very least, I would support keeping it if an independent board was appointed and they would decide on it. This would take the politics out of it, which is what is really messing it up.
... Miles... always a thoughtful, well-expressed comment.
... Unfortunately, once a nation begins down the slippery slope of economic collectivism- the philosophy that everyone's income and property is to be considered common property (communism) to be re-distributed by the state- there is no possible objective line to limit this intervention.
Post a Comment