tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859678.post3167514329774714784..comments2023-10-14T05:50:19.314-04:00Comments on Making Sense with Nicholls: Victory for freedom in QuebecGerry Nichollshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10496716615185797501noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859678.post-48984872310213865572009-10-26T13:17:14.524-04:002009-10-26T13:17:14.524-04:00This is also a victory for parental school choice ...This is also a victory for parental school choice in Quebec!TorontoDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859678.post-64538976051853192752009-10-22T19:41:09.617-04:002009-10-22T19:41:09.617-04:00Any bets on whether Quebec uses the "Not With...<i>Any bets on whether Quebec uses the "Not Withstanding Clause?"</i><br /><br />They can't. The SCC's decision was based on the fact that the rule infringed of rights s. 23 of the Charter. The notwithstanding clause can only be used to protect legislation that violates s. 2 & 7-15.KChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16932623568330893522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859678.post-15042802384421792392009-10-22T17:06:28.236-04:002009-10-22T17:06:28.236-04:00Excellent newsExcellent newsRoy Eappenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04797589638971623701noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17859678.post-57643109096742726442009-10-22T13:23:45.705-04:002009-10-22T13:23:45.705-04:00Any bets on whether Quebec uses the "Not With...Any bets on whether Quebec uses the "Not Withstanding Clause?"Mr. Lornehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13520591510834267209noreply@blogger.com